[Isocops] IBEX Orbit # 172 and #173 Ibex_Lo Commands

Harald Kucharek harald.kucharek at unh.edu
Wed Jul 11 16:27:47 EDT 2012


Hi Chelle,

I approve the STF for IBEX-lo. But, I would propose to leave one or two
minutes between ramping the PAC and ramping the MCP up/down. This would
allow the PAC voltage/current to settle. This is a suggestion, no condition.

Best regards,
Harald
 


On 7/11/12 11:54 AM, "Reno, Michelle" <mreno at swri.edu> wrote:

> Approvals needed by 5pm EDT today. MOC, ISOC (Ken), Lo, Hi, CEU. Since this
> was a manual STF generation I want many eyes on it, in case anything was
> overlooked in the STF approval phase.
>  
> Thanks Sheral!
> 
> 
> From: isocops-bounces at lists.sr.unh.edu on behalf of Ibex Mission Operations
> Sent: Wed 7/11/2012 10:29 AM
> To: Eberhard Moebius; Bret Hautamaki; IBEX-FDG; IBEXOPS/ORB; ISOC at New
> Hampshire; John Cavallo; Tapley, Mark; Robert Lockwood; Roland Vanderspek;
> Ryan Tyler; Sheral Wesley; Thomas Regiec; Tim Perry; Walker Cross; David
> Heirtzler
> Subject: [Isocops] IBEX Orbit # 172 and #173 Ibex_Lo Commands
> 
> Guys,
>     Here are the command loads for IBEX_Lo during Orbits #172 and #173
>  
> The errors contained with the CCVR's are normal because we did not build a
> complete command load.
> The Lo commands were built using OEF files from the corresponding Orbits.
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sr.unh.edu/mailman/private/isocops/attachments/20120711/a9c728d4/attachment.html 


More information about the Isocops mailing list