[Isocops] Tests

[Reno, Michelle]

Looks good to me (have not looked at timing, just commands), except it does not set the start/stop bins for O-mode. I thought in the original email they mentioned the specific pointing angles they wanted to run in.
 
David - you know how to set those commands correct? 
 
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chelle Reno
Austin Mission Consulting
106 E. 6th St. Ste. 939
Austin, TX  78701
(512) 704-3394 (o)
(210) 478-7337 (c)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

________________________________

From: Nathan Schwadron [mailto:nschwadron at mac.com]
Sent: Wed 6/9/2010 1:46 PM
To: Dunn, Greg
Cc: Reno, Michelle; Greg Dunn; Mark Tapley; David Heirtzler; isoc cops
Subject: Re: [Isocops] Tests


OK, so once more with feeling ..  

2010-07-01T13:00:00.000Z||CEU_MODE            HVENG
2010-07-01T13:00:10.000Z||CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE OXYGEN
2010-07-01T13:00:20.000Z||CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN     3,1,3,1
2010-07-01T13:01:40.000Z||CEU_MODE         &n! bsp; &nbs v> 
2010-07-02T01:28:20.000Z||CEU_MODE            HVENG
2010-07-02T01:29:40.000Z||CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE NORMAL
2010-07-02T01:30:00.000Z||CEU_MODE            HVSCI

Any objections before I send this tonight to the Lo team?

-N

On Jun 9, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Dunn, Greg wrote:


		-----Original Message-----
		

		Fr! om: Natha adron at mac.com] 
		

		Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 11:54 AM
		

		To: Reno, Michelle
		

		Cc: Greg Dunn; David Heirtzler; isoc cops; Mark Tapley; Chelle Reno
		

		Subject: Re: [Isocops] Tests
		


		What are the default values for the Lo Science Plan?
		


	1,7,2,1
	No need to set back to defaults, though.
	
	


		Here is the stf I have so far .. this is generated via the 
		

		oxymode.pl <http://oxymode.pl/>  script, which is now installed on ena.
		


		2010-07-01T13:00:00.000Z||CEU_MODE            HVENG
		
		

		2010-07-01T13:00:20.000Z||CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN            3,1,3,1
		

		2010-07-01T13:01:40.000Z||CEU_MODE            HVSCI
		

		2010-07-02T05:58:20.000Z||CEU_MODE            HVENG
		

		2010-07-02T05:59:40.000Z||CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE           NORMAL
		

		2010-07-02T06:00:00.000Z||CEU_MODE            HVSCI
		


	Can you put more time between the "CEU_MODE HVENG" and the
	CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE commands (two places)? &nbs! p;The SCI be rejected if the CEU_MODE hasn't transitioned 
	to HVENG; and the CEU_MODE changes on spin boundaries, so you 
	should wait at least one spin time before issuing the 
	SCIENCE_MODE command. 30 seconds should be a good delay.
	
	-- Greg
	
	
	
	
	



		On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Reno, Michelle wrote:
		



		No LO_SCIENCE_PLAN command is needed if the LO_SCIENCE 
		

		MODE is normal.
		

		
		

		~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
		

		
		

		Chelle Reno
		

		Austin Mission Consulting
		

		106 E. 6th St. Ste. 939
		

		Austin, TX  78701
		

		(512) 704-3394 (o)
		

		(210) 478-7337 (c)
		

		~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
		


		_________________! _________ lockquote type="cite">
		

		From: Nathan Schwadron [mailto:nschwadron at mac.com]
		

		Sent: Wed 6/9/2010 11:25 AM
		

		To: Dunn, Greg
		

		Cc: Dunn, Greg; David Heirtzler; isoc cops; Mark 
		

		Tapley; Chelle Reno
		

		Subject: Re: [Isocops] Tests
		

		
		

		
		

	The STF needs to take us into the Oxygen mode and then 
	

	out again.
	

	
	

	When we go back to the normal science mode, I issue the command
	

	
	

	timestamp || CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE NORMAL
	

	
	

	I assume this renders CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN irrelevant. Or 
	

	need to be reset?
	

	
	

	-N
	

	
	

	On Jun 9, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Dunn, Greg wrote:
	

	
	

	>> I was going to set table 2 to 0 and the cadence to 0 so that
	

	>> we just use table 1.
	

	>
	> You can't set a cadence of 0.  If you want to keep 
	

	the same table
	

	> throughout, then set the same table for both.  In 
	

	that case, the
	

	> cadence doesn't really matter:
	

	>
	

	> timestamp || CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN  3, 1, 3, 1
	

	>
	

	r my question below .. I am confused about
	

	>> the cadence.
	

	>
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>> I am confused here. I thought I wrote 10 cycles of table 3
	

	>>>> and then 1 cycle of table 1. So that would be
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>> 64*10 = 640 spins of t! able 3
	>>>> 64*1    = 64 spine of table 1
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>> Is that right?
	

	>
	

	> Oops, I didn't read down far enough to see this question.
	

	>
	

	> I think you're right, I must have grabbed the '4' from the
	

	> table select instead of the '10' from the cadence in my
	

	> previous response.  Sorry about the confusion.
	

	>
	

	> -- Greg
	

	>
	

	>>
	

	>>
	

	>> -N
	

	>! >
	< ype="cite"> >> On Jun 9, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Dunn, Greg wrote:
	

	>>
	

	>>>> Thanks for pointing out my mistake in the table .. 
	

	it should
	

	>>>> be table 3 .. righto!
	

	>>>
	

	>>> Also for the second table do you intend to a cycle of Fall
	

	>! ;>> ently written, or should that be
	

	>>> table 0 (normal sweep)?
	

	>>>
	

	>>> -- Greg
	

	>>>
	

	>>>> -----Original Message-----
	

	>>>> From: Nathan Schwadron [mailto:nschwadron at mac.com]
	

	>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 9:18 ! AM
	>>>> To: Dunn, Greg
	

	>>>> Cc: Greg Dunn; Mark Tapley; Ken Fairchild; Chelle 
	

	Reno; David
	

	>>>> Heirtzler; Geoff Crew; isoc cops
	

	>>>> Subject: Re: Tests
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>> Hi Greg
	

	>>>>
	

! >>>> Thanks for pointing out my mistake in the table .. 


	it should
	

	>>>> be table 3 .. righto!
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>>   
	

	>>>>   
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>>            timestamp || CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE OXYGEN
	

	>>>>           
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>>            timestamp || CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN  3, 10, 1, 1
	

	>>>>           
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>>            Would that indicate to use table 3 for
	

	>>>>           
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>>            10 cycles and then table 1 (Fall 
	

	Oxygen, ESA2) for 1
	

	>>>>     &n! bsp;  
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>>            cycle.
	

	>>>>           
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>>    Yes.
	

	>>>>  ! ;  >>>>   
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>>            If so, does one cycle corresond to a typical
	

	>>>> voltage step
	

	>>>>           
	

	>>>>
	

	>>! >> nbsp;      (e.g., two spins)?
	

	>>>>           
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>>
	

	>>>>    As Geoff mentioned, a cycle corresponds to an Oxygen
	

	>>>>    Histogram cycle.  So y! ou would able
	

	>>>>    4, then 64! spins of > 

		>>>>   
		

		>>>>   
		

		>>>>
		

		>>>>
		

		>>>> I am confused here. I thought I wrote 10 cycles of table 3
		

		>>>> and then 1 cycle of table 1. So that would be
		

		>>>>
		

		>>>> 64*10 = 640 spins of table 3
		

		>>>> 64*1    = 64 spine of table 1
		

		>>>>
		

		>>>> Is that right?
		

		>>>>
		

		>>>> Nathan
		

		>>>>
		

		>>>>
		

		>>>>           
		

		>>>>
		

		>>>>
		

		>>>>
		

		>>>>
		

		>>>>
		

		>>>
		

		>>
		

		>>
		

		>
		

		>
		

		>
		

		> Please restrict discussions on this email list to 
		

		non-ITAR sensitive topics.
		

		> ______________________________________________
		

		> Isocops mailing list
		

		> Is >
		<mailto:Isocops at lists.sr.un!%20h.edu> 

		> http://lists.sr.unh.edu/mailman/listinfo/isocops
		

		
		

		
		







	Please restrict discussions on this email list to non-ITAR sensitive topics.
	______________________________________________
	Isocops mailing list
	Isocops at lists.sr.unh.edu
	http://lists.sr.unh.edu/mailman/listinfo/isocops
	


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sr.unh.edu/mailman/private/isocops/attachments/20100609/d59e5f66/attachment-0001.html