[Isocops] Tests
Nathan Schwadron
nschwadron at mac.com
Wed Jun 9 14:46:30 EDT 2010
OK, so once more with feeling ..
2010-07-01T13:00:00.000Z||CEU_MODE HVENG
2010-07-01T13:00:10.000Z||CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE OXYGEN
2010-07-01T13:00:20.000Z||CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN 3,1,3,1
2010-07-01T13:01:40.000Z||CEU_MODE HVSCI
2010-07-02T01:28:20.000Z||CEU_MODE HVENG
2010-07-02T01:29:40.000Z||CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE NORMAL
2010-07-02T01:30:00.000Z||CEU_MODE HVSCI
Any objections before I send this tonight to the Lo team?
-N
On Jun 9, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Dunn, Greg wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nathan Schwadron [mailto:nschwadron at mac.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 11:54 AM
>> To: Reno, Michelle
>> Cc: Greg Dunn; David Heirtzler; isoc cops; Mark Tapley; Chelle Reno
>> Subject: Re: [Isocops] Tests
>>
>> What are the default values for the Lo Science Plan?
>
> 1,7,2,1
> No need to set back to defaults, though.
>
>>
>> Here is the stf I have so far .. this is generated via the
>> oxymode.pl script, which is now installed on ena.
>>
>> 2010-07-01T13:00:00.000Z||CEU_MODE HVENG
>> 2010-07-01T13:00:10.000Z||CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE OXYGEN
>> 2010-07-01T13:00:20.000Z||CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN 3,1,3,1
>> 2010-07-01T13:01:40.000Z||CEU_MODE HVSCI
>> 2010-07-02T05:58:20.000Z||CEU_MODE HVENG
>> 2010-07-02T05:59:40.000Z||CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE NORMAL
>> 2010-07-02T06:00:00.000Z||CEU_MODE HVSCI
>
> Can you put more time between the "CEU_MODE HVENG" and the
> CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE commands (two places)? The SCIENCE_MODE
> command will be rejected if the CEU_MODE hasn't transitioned
> to HVENG; and the CEU_MODE changes on spin boundaries, so you
> should wait at least one spin time before issuing the
> SCIENCE_MODE command. 30 seconds should be a good delay.
>
> -- Greg
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Reno, Michelle wrote:
>>
>>
>> No LO_SCIENCE_PLAN command is needed if the LO_SCIENCE
>> MODE is normal.
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Chelle Reno
>> Austin Mission Consulting
>> 106 E. 6th St. Ste. 939
>> Austin, TX 78701
>> (512) 704-3394 (o)
>> (210) 478-7337 (c)
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: Nathan Schwadron [mailto:nschwadron at mac.com]
>> Sent: Wed 6/9/2010 11:25 AM
>> To: Dunn, Greg
>> Cc: Dunn, Greg; David Heirtzler; isoc cops; Mark
>> Tapley; Chelle Reno
>> Subject: Re: [Isocops] Tests
>>
>>
>>
>> The STF needs to take us into the Oxygen mode and then
>> out again.
>>
>> When we go back to the normal science mode, I issue the command
>>
>> timestamp || CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE NORMAL
>>
>> I assume this renders CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN irrelevant. Or
>> does that parameter also need to be reset?
>>
>> -N
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Dunn, Greg wrote:
>>
>> >> I was going to set table 2 to 0 and the cadence to 0 so that
>> >> we just use table 1.
>> >
>> > You can't set a cadence of 0. If you want to keep
>> the same table
>> > throughout, then set the same table for both. In
>> that case, the
>> > cadence doesn't really matter:
>> >
>> > timestamp || CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN 3, 1, 3, 1
>> >
>> >> You didn't answer my question below .. I am confused about
>> >> the cadence.
>> >
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I am confused here. I thought I wrote 10 cycles of table 3
>> >>>> and then 1 cycle of table 1. So that would be
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 64*10 = 640 spins of table 3
>> >>>> 64*1 = 64 spine of table 1
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Is that right?
>> >
>> > Oops, I didn't read down far enough to see this question.
>> >
>> > I think you're right, I must have grabbed the '4' from the
>> > table select instead of the '10' from the cadence in my
>> > previous response. Sorry about the confusion.
>> >
>> > -- Greg
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -N
>> >>
>> >> On Jun 9, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Dunn, Greg wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>> Thanks for pointing out my mistake in the table ..
>> it should
>> >>>> be table 3 .. righto!
>> >>>
>> >>> Also for the second table do you intend to a cycle of Fall
>> >>> Oxygen (table 1) as currently written, or should that be
>> >>> table 0 (normal sweep)?
>> >>>
>> >>> -- Greg
>> >>>
>> >>>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>>> From: Nathan Schwadron [mailto:nschwadron at mac.com]
>> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 9:18 AM
>> >>>> To: Dunn, Greg
>> >>>> Cc: Greg Dunn; Mark Tapley; Ken Fairchild; Chelle
>> Reno; David
>> >>>> Heirtzler; Geoff Crew; isoc cops
>> >>>> Subject: Re: Tests
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hi Greg
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks for pointing out my mistake in the table ..
>> it should
>> >>>> be table 3 .. righto!
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> timestamp || CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE OXYGEN
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> timestamp || CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN 3, 10, 1, 1
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Would that indicate to use table 3 for
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 10 cycles and then table 1 (Fall
>> Oxygen, ESA2) for 1
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> cycle.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Yes.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If so, does one cycle corresond to a typical
>> >>>> voltage step
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> (e.g., two spins)?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> As Geoff mentioned, a cycle corresponds to an Oxygen
>> >>>> Histogram cycle. So y! ou would able
>> >>>> 4, then 64 spins of table 1.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I am confused here. I thought I wrote 10 cycles of table 3
>> >>>> and then 1 cycle of table 1. So that would be
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 64*10 = 640 spins of table 3
>> >>>> 64*1 = 64 spine of table 1
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Is that right?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Nathan
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Nathan
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Please restrict discussions on this email list to
>> non-ITAR sensitive topics.
>> > ______________________________________________
>> > Isocops mailing list
>> > Isocops at lists.sr.unh.edu
>> > http://lists.sr.unh.edu/mailman/listinfo/isocops
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> Please restrict discussions on this email list to non-ITAR sensitive topics.
> ______________________________________________
> Isocops mailing list
> Isocops at lists.sr.unh.edu
> http://lists.sr.unh.edu/mailman/listinfo/isocops
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sr.unh.edu/mailman/private/isocops/attachments/20100609/1de23769/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Isocops
mailing list