[Isocops] Tests
Reno, Michelle
mreno at swri.edu
Wed Jun 9 14:56:42 EDT 2010
Nevermind - those commands are not one of the original SET_PARAMETER commands so they need to be issued via ground command. We will set up a CAR to reset those values. The CAR just needs to be executed sometime before the commands below execute.
Hope I didnt add to the confusion.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chelle Reno
Austin Mission Consulting
106 E. 6th St. Ste. 939
Austin, TX 78701
(512) 704-3394 (o)
(210) 478-7337 (c)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
________________________________
From: Reno, Michelle
Sent: Wed 6/9/2010 1:51 PM
To: Nathan Schwadron; Dunn, Greg
Cc: Reno, Michelle; Greg Dunn; Mark Tapley; David Heirtzler; isoc cops
Subject: RE: [Isocops] Tests
Looks good to me (have not looked at timing, just commands), except it does not set the start/stop bins for O-mode. I thought in the original email they mentioned the specific pointing angles they wanted to run in.
David - you know how to set those commands correct?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chelle Reno
Austin Mission Consulting
106 E. 6th St. Ste. 939
Austin, TX 78701
(512) 704-3394 (o)
(210) 478-7337 (c)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
________________________________
From: Nathan Schwadron [mailto:nschwadron at mac.com]
Sent: Wed 6/9/2010 1:46 PM
To: Dunn, Greg
Cc: Reno, Michelle; Greg Dunn; Mark Tapley; David Heirtzler; isoc cops
Subject: Re: [Isocops] Tests
OK, so once more with feeling ..
2010-07-01T13:00:00.000Z||CEU_MODE HVENG
2010-07-01T13:00:10.000Z||CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE OXYGEN
2010-07-01T13:00:20.000Z||CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN 3,1,3,1
2010-07-01T13:01:40.000Z||CEU_MODE &n! bsp; &nbs v>
2010-07-02T01:28:20.000Z||CEU_MODE HVENG
2010-07-02T01:29:40.000Z||CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE NORMAL
2010-07-02T01:30:00.000Z||CEU_MODE HVSCI
Any objections before I send this tonight to the Lo team?
-N
On Jun 9, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Dunn, Greg wrote:
-----Original Message-----
Fr! om: Natha adron at mac.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 11:54 AM
To: Reno, Michelle
Cc: Greg Dunn; David Heirtzler; isoc cops; Mark Tapley; Chelle Reno
Subject: Re: [Isocops] Tests
What are the default values for the Lo Science Plan?
1,7,2,1
No need to set back to defaults, though.
Here is the stf I have so far .. this is generated via the
oxymode.pl <http://oxymode.pl/> script, which is now installed on ena.
2010-07-01T13:00:00.000Z||CEU_MODE HVENG
2010-07-01T13:00:20.000Z||CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN 3,1,3,1
2010-07-01T13:01:40.000Z||CEU_MODE HVSCI
2010-07-02T05:58:20.000Z||CEU_MODE HVENG
2010-07-02T05:59:40.000Z||CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE NORMAL
2010-07-02T06:00:00.000Z||CEU_MODE HVSCI
Can you put more time between the "CEU_MODE HVENG" and the
CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE commands (two places)? &nbs! p;The SCI be rejected if the CEU_MODE hasn't transitioned
to HVENG; and the CEU_MODE changes on spin boundaries, so you
should wait at least one spin time before issuing the
SCIENCE_MODE command. 30 seconds should be a good delay.
-- Greg
On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Reno, Michelle wrote:
No LO_SCIENCE_PLAN command is needed if the LO_SCIENCE
MODE is normal.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chelle Reno
Austin Mission Consulting
106 E. 6th St. Ste. 939
Austin, TX 78701
(512) 704-3394 (o)
(210) 478-7337 (c)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_________________! _________ lockquote type="cite">
From: Nathan Schwadron [mailto:nschwadron at mac.com]
Sent: Wed 6/9/2010 11:25 AM
To: Dunn, Greg
Cc: Dunn, Greg; David Heirtzler; isoc cops; Mark
Tapley; Chelle Reno
Subject: Re: [Isocops] Tests
The STF needs to take us into the Oxygen mode and then
out again.
When we go back to the normal science mode, I issue the command
timestamp || CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE NORMAL
I assume this renders CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN irrelevant. Or
need to be reset?
-N
On Jun 9, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Dunn, Greg wrote:
>> I was going to set table 2 to 0 and the cadence to 0 so that
>> we just use table 1.
>
> You can't set a cadence of 0. If you want to keep
the same table
> throughout, then set the same table for both. In
that case, the
> cadence doesn't really matter:
>
> timestamp || CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN 3, 1, 3, 1
>
r my question below .. I am confused about
>> the cadence.
>
>>>>
>>>> I am confused here. I thought I wrote 10 cycles of table 3
>>>> and then 1 cycle of table 1. So that would be
>>>>
>>>> 64*10 = 640 spins of t! able 3
>>>> 64*1 = 64 spine of table 1
>>>>
>>>> Is that right?
>
> Oops, I didn't read down far enough to see this question.
>
> I think you're right, I must have grabbed the '4' from the
> table select instead of the '10' from the cadence in my
> previous response. Sorry about the confusion.
>
> -- Greg
>
>>
>>
>> -N
>! >
< ype="cite"> >> On Jun 9, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Dunn, Greg wrote:
>>
>>>> Thanks for pointing out my mistake in the table ..
it should
>>>> be table 3 .. righto!
>>>
>>> Also for the second table do you intend to a cycle of Fall
>! ;>> ently written, or should that be
>>> table 0 (normal sweep)?
>>>
>>> -- Greg
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Nathan Schwadron [mailto:nschwadron at mac.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 9:18 ! AM
>>>> To: Dunn, Greg
>>>> Cc: Greg Dunn; Mark Tapley; Ken Fairchild; Chelle
Reno; David
>>>> Heirtzler; Geoff Crew; isoc cops
>>>> Subject: Re: Tests
>>>>
>>>> Hi Greg
>>>>
! >>>> Thanks for pointing out my mistake in the table ..
it should
>>>> be table 3 .. righto!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> timestamp || CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE OXYGEN
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> timestamp || CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN 3, 10, 1, 1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Would that indicate to use table 3 for
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 10 cycles and then table 1 (Fall
Oxygen, ESA2) for 1
>>>> &n! bsp;
>>>>
>>>> cycle.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>> ! ; >>>>
>>>>
>>>> If so, does one cycle corresond to a typical
>>>> voltage step
>>>>
>>>>
>>! >> nbsp; (e.g., two spins)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As Geoff mentioned, a cycle corresponds to an Oxygen
>>>> Histogram cycle. So y! ou would able
>>>> 4, then 64! spins of >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am confused here. I thought I wrote 10 cycles of table 3
>>>> and then 1 cycle of table 1. So that would be
>>>>
>>>> 64*10 = 640 spins of table 3
>>>> 64*1 = 64 spine of table 1
>>>>
>>>> Is that right?
>>>>
>>>> Nathan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> Please restrict discussions on this email list to
non-ITAR sensitive topics.
> ______________________________________________
> Isocops mailing list
> Is >
<mailto:Isocops at lists.sr.un!%20h.edu>
> http://lists.sr.unh.edu/mailman/listinfo/isocops
Please restrict discussions on this email list to non-ITAR sensitive topics.
______________________________________________
Isocops mailing list
Isocops at lists.sr.unh.edu
http://lists.sr.unh.edu/mailman/listinfo/isocops
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sr.unh.edu/mailman/private/isocops/attachments/20100609/f3a3d407/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Isocops
mailing list