[Isocops] Tests

[Reno, Michelle]

No LO_SCIENCE_PLAN command is needed if the LO_SCIENCE MODE is normal.
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chelle Reno
Austin Mission Consulting
106 E. 6th St. Ste. 939
Austin, TX  78701
(512) 704-3394 (o)
(210) 478-7337 (c)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

________________________________

From: Nathan Schwadron [mailto:nschwadron at mac.com]
Sent: Wed 6/9/2010 11:25 AM
To: Dunn, Greg
Cc: Dunn, Greg; David Heirtzler; isoc cops; Mark Tapley; Chelle Reno
Subject: Re: [Isocops] Tests



The STF needs to take us into the Oxygen mode and then out again.

When we go back to the normal science mode, I issue the command

timestamp || CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE NORMAL

I assume this renders CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN irrelevant. Or does that parameter also need to be reset?

-N

On Jun 9, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Dunn, Greg wrote:

>> I was going to set table 2 to 0 and the cadence to 0 so that
>> we just use table 1.
>
> You can't set a cadence of 0.  If you want to keep the same table
> throughout, then set the same table for both.  In that case, the
> cadence doesn't really matter:
>
> timestamp || CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN  3, 1, 3, 1
>
>> You didn't answer my question below .. I am confused about
>> the cadence.
>
>>>>
>>>> I am confused here. I thought I wrote 10 cycles of table 3
>>>> and then 1 cycle of table 1. So that would be
>>>>
>>>> 64*10 = 640 spins of table 3
>>>> 64*1    = 64 spine of table 1
>>>>
>>>> Is that right?
>
> Oops, I didn't read down far enough to see this question.
>
> I think you're right, I must have grabbed the '4' from the
> table select instead of the '10' from the cadence in my
> previous response.  Sorry about the confusion.
>
> -- Greg
>
>>
>>
>> -N
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Dunn, Greg wrote:
>>
>>>> Thanks for pointing out my mistake in the table .. it should
>>>> be table 3 .. righto!
>>>
>>> Also for the second table do you intend to a cycle of Fall
>>> Oxygen (table 1) as currently written, or should that be
>>> table 0 (normal sweep)?
>>>
>>> -- Greg
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Nathan Schwadron [mailto:nschwadron at mac.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 9:18 AM
>>>> To: Dunn, Greg
>>>> Cc: Greg Dunn; Mark Tapley; Ken Fairchild; Chelle Reno; David
>>>> Heirtzler; Geoff Crew; isoc cops
>>>> Subject: Re: Tests
>>>>
>>>> Hi Greg
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for pointing out my mistake in the table .. it should
>>>> be table 3 .. righto!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>            timestamp || CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE OXYGEN
>>>>           
>>>>
>>>>            timestamp || CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN  3, 10, 1, 1
>>>>           
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>            Would that indicate to use table 3 for
>>>>           
>>>>
>>>>            10 cycles and then table 1 (Fall Oxygen, ESA2) for 1
>>>>           
>>>>
>>>>            cycle.
>>>>           
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    Yes.
>>>>   
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>            If so, does one cycle corresond to a typical
>>>> voltage step
>>>>           
>>>>
>>>>            (e.g., two spins)?
>>>>           
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    As Geoff mentioned, a cycle corresponds to an Oxygen
>>>>    Histogram cycle.  So y! ou would able
>>>>    4, then 64 spins of table 1.
>>>>   
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am confused here. I thought I wrote 10 cycles of table 3
>>>> and then 1 cycle of table 1. So that would be
>>>>
>>>> 64*10 = 640 spins of table 3
>>>> 64*1    = 64 spine of table 1
>>>>
>>>> Is that right?
>>>>
>>>> Nathan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>            Cheers
>>>>           
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>            Nathan
>>>>           
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> Please restrict discussions on this email list to non-ITAR sensitive topics.
> ______________________________________________
> Isocops mailing list
> Isocops at lists.sr.unh.edu
> http://lists.sr.unh.edu/mailman/listinfo/isocops



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sr.unh.edu/mailman/private/isocops/attachments/20100609/af656524/attachment.html