[Isocops] Tests

[Dunn, Greg]

> Thanks for pointing out my mistake in the table .. it should 
> be table 3 .. righto!

Also for the second table do you intend to a cycle of Fall
Oxygen (table 1) as currently written, or should that be 
table 0 (normal sweep)?

-- Greg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Schwadron [mailto:nschwadron at mac.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 9:18 AM
> To: Dunn, Greg
> Cc: Greg Dunn; Mark Tapley; Ken Fairchild; Chelle Reno; David 
> Heirtzler; Geoff Crew; isoc cops
> Subject: Re: Tests
> 
> Hi Greg
> 
> Thanks for pointing out my mistake in the table .. it should 
> be table 3 .. righto!
> 
> 
> 	
> 	
> 
> 		timestamp || CEU_LO_SCIENCE_MODE OXYGEN
> 		
> 
> 		timestamp || CEU_LO_SCI_PLAN  3, 10, 1, 1
> 		
> 
> 
> 		Would that indicate to use table 3 for
> 		
> 
> 		10 cycles and then table 1 (Fall Oxygen, ESA2) for 1
> 		
> 
> 		cycle. 
> 		
> 
> 
> 	Yes.
> 	
> 	
> 
> 		If so, does one cycle corresond to a typical 
> voltage step
> 		
> 
> 		(e.g., two spins)?
> 		
> 
> 
> 	As Geoff mentioned, a cycle corresponds to an Oxygen
> 	Histogram cycle.  So y! ou would able
> 	4, then 64 spins of table 1.
> 	
> 	
> 
> 
> I am confused here. I thought I wrote 10 cycles of table 3 
> and then 1 cycle of table 1. So that would be 
> 
> 64*10 = 640 spins of table 3 
> 64*1    = 64 spine of table 1
> 
> Is that right?
> 
> Nathan
> 
> 
> 
> 		Cheers
> 		
> 
> 
> 
> 		Nathan
> 		
> 
> 
> 
> 
>