I love it when a plan comes together.  We meant to do that!  I guess it was in the instrument paper for a reason….too many years now.
________________________________
Harlan E. Spence
Director, Institute for the Study of Earth,
   Oceans, & Space and Prof. of Physics 
Morse Hall, Room 306 
University of New Hampshire
8 College Road
Durham, NH 03824-3525

Phone: 603-862-0322
Fax:   603-862-1915

http://www.eos.unh.edu/Faculty/Spence
________________________________



On Dec 6, 2018, at 2:36 PM, Anthony Case <tonycase@cfa.harvard.edu> wrote:

Since we were discussing the possibility of side-penetrators yesterday, I went back and looked at the solid model for the instrument to see how much shielding is on the sides of the detectors.  There are a couple images attached.  The outer wall of the telescope housing is 0.2 cm, and the added shielding was essentially a C-channel with 0.2cm walls that was bolted onto the outside of the telescope housing.  So for normally incident particles there is just the end-caps which are 0.076 cm (which gives us our usual ~10-12 MeV protons required to get into the instrument).  And for side-penetrators to get through a 0.4cm thick wall requires about 27.5 MeV.  That neglects the detector frame, which could add another >0.5 cm.  Of course any particular particle's path through all of this junk is fairly complex, but roughly speaking 30-50 MeV seems like the minimum energy a side-penetrating proton would need to reach the detector.

<image.png>

<image.png>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Anthony Case
Astrophysicist
High Energy Astrophysics Division (HEAD/SSXG)
Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian
Cell: (617) 304 0768
60 Garden Street | MS 58 | Cambridge, MA 02138
_______________________________________________
Crater-team mailing list
Crater-team@lists.sr.unh.edu
https://lists.sr.unh.edu/mailman/listinfo/crater-team